Special Detention Program for Mohamedou Ould Slahi
Guantanamo DiaryThe Special Interrogation Plan for Mohamedou Ould Slahi was a military-authorized program for his interrogation at Guantánamo in 2003. It linked high-level approval to controlled isolation, a deceptive staged transfer, and a specially prepared cell at Camp Echo. Later investigations documented important parts of the plan and its implementation, providing independent support for central elements of Slahi’s account without making every classified record or redaction available for verification.
Authorization and institutional record
The plan emerged while military interrogators were already collecting intelligence reports from Slahi. When prosecutor Stuart Couch’s investigator gained access to interrogators’ files, those files included daily memoranda recording both what was said in sessions and how information was obtained. The records remained classified, but the Senate Armed Services Committee and the Justice Department later summarized a second, painstaking interrogation plan that they said unfolded almost exactly as Slahi described in his account.
The approval process took place over several weeks. General Geoffrey Miller submitted the plan to General James Hill on July 18, 2003; Hill forwarded it to Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, and Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz approved it on July 28. Rumsfeld signed it on August 13. The investigative record also situated the plan within a broader sequence of authorizations: military interrogation methods had previously been addressed in the December 2002 Counter Resistance Techniques memorandum and a March 2003 legal opinion. The Senate inquiry found that Miller sought Pentagon approval for Slahi’s plan and that Rumsfeld personally signed off on it.
Isolation and controlled surroundings
The plan’s operation depended on controlling Slahi’s access to people, light, and information. Before the transfer, he described being held apart from other detainees in an emptied area; on August 25, he noted that the cell was warmer and had daylight compared with the frozen cell in which he had been confined. The changing conditions did not end his isolation: separation from the wider detainee community remained part of the arrangement.
The planned destination was a hut at Camp Echo containing both a cell and an interrogation room. Committee findings described alterations intended to reduce outside stimuli: the doors were to be sealed against light, the walls could be covered with white material, and the room was to contain an eyebolt and speakers. An August 21 email reported preparations to prevent light entering Slahi’s cell and to cover its exterior with a tarp so that he could not see guards. These details show that the plan treated the room itself as an instrument of interrogation, regulating what Slahi could perceive and whom he could see.
The staged transfer
On August 25, 2003, Slahi was taken from his cell in Camp Delta wearing blackout goggles and carried on a disorienting boat ride. The plan called for a staged scene in which personnel in riot gear removed him, placed him aboard a watercraft, and drove him around so that he would believe he had been taken off the island. During the ride, he was allowed to hear conversations that had been planned to mislead him. The transfer was therefore not simply movement between locations: it was designed to create a false impression that he had entered a place where the rules had changed.
An earlier version of the plan proposed hooding Slahi and flying him around Guantánamo Bay by helicopter for one or two hours. According to the Justice Department Inspector General, interrogators later said Miller rejected that approach because it was logistically difficult and would require too many people on the base to know about it. The boat ride was the substitute ultimately used. Distinguishing the abandoned helicopter proposal from the documented boat transfer clarifies which elements of the plan were carried out and which were not.
Corroboration and limits
The plan became publicly legible through a combination of Slahi’s narrative, records uncovered by Couch’s investigator, and later government investigations. The Senate Armed Services Committee’s inquiry and the Justice Department Inspector General’s review documented key procedures, preparations, and the transfer. Their accounts supported Slahi’s description of the special interrogation, while the underlying interrogators’ files remained classified.
The manuscript’s editorial notes also set a boundary on what can be claimed: they describe efforts to assess redactions using context and public records, not to reconstruct classified text. The Special Interrogation Plan can therefore be understood through its documented approvals and reported procedures, but not as a fully accessible record. Its significance lies both in the organized use of isolation and deception and in the contrast between the secrecy surrounding the operation and the later public evidence that tested Slahi’s account.